But is math not a universal truth.

What about Buddha's truth, that attachments will in the end lead to pain.

Is there a scenario where that is wrong?

What about insight in one's own processes, is that not truth?

If the process is the same in other people they would need the same truth to solve them.

I am objecting the idea, that we can't find a clear answer to things, this idea is leaving us in a rather more confused state, where everything is of some sort okay, and is a excuse or blockage to go deeper in ours lifes to find truths.

That is sadly a widespread view and is related to tolerance too. Tolerant people are running around and tell people that everything is of somesort okay.

But they just avoid with this clever approach the conflict that comes with decisions, that is just the easy way out. Decisions can be painfull, a clear point of perspective is opposing oneself to other people and therefore too painfull. That is the nature of opinions. But if one is aware what opinions are doing to us then there is possibility to overcome that conflict. With awareness comes the insight in this process of opinonmaking that is creating a gap between oneself and others and if the opinionmaker is realizing he is tending to get stuck in this thoughtprocess, he can make the decission to step out of it because he sees that is just a thought in his mind to which there is no need to cling because clinging to it would mean conflict and therefore suffering.

For me there are a lot of univrsal truths around and I think the statement that there are no truths is a dangerous statement, because it will need to nowhere.

Just my thoughts, thanks for the article and raising that issue. I don't understand much of the creek philosophers, so I can't comment on that.